Introduction
The recent Typhoon
that has racked the Philippines has been making me think about the incredible
power Mother Nature has on it citizens. This recent tragedy has sparked my remembrance
of the tsunami that hit Japan more than two years ago, and the resulting
Fukushima nuclear meltdown that ensued. I proceeded to the trusty internet to
see what kind of progress had been made on the disasters clean up. This fruitful
search turned up what I find to be a very informative and well written piece by
the New York Times. After reading it I became curious of the impact it will
have Biosystems engineers and the judgments of our work. The article I read can
be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/11/world/asia/removing-fuel-rods-poses-new-risks-at-crippled-nuclear-plant-in-japan.html?_r=0The Article
This article by Hiroko Tabuchi is very well written and I believe a credible account of the goings on in japan right now. Tabuchi gains credibility in ethos because she has been writing for several years, the last five years at The New York Times reporting on the business, economics, and technology in Japan. Also, I trust this article because it is full of logos. She backs her clams in the report with concrete facts, citing certain dates and referencing well know scientist and professionals in the area. This article is also is trustworthy because it is clearly not an opinions article because there is practically no emotional pathos involved.
Background
The tsunami and
earth quake sent the Tokyo Electric Power Company’s (tepco) nuclear power this facility is projected
to be a long process and the removal of fuel rods at Reactor No. 4 is merely
one step. A step that happens to be potentially dangerous. The rods have to be
removed by crane and if the casks are dropped, further disaster would ensue. “The
company said it has taken extra precautions. The plant has been preparing for
months, erecting a steel structure around and over the damaged reactor building
and fitting it with a crane to lift the casks about 100 feet in the air.”
Reports Hiroko Tabuchi. The entire cleanup process will have an effect on
Nuclear energy and the engineers that are devoted to it.
complex
out of control. A hydrogen explosion blowing of the roof of the spent fuel pool
at Reactor No. 4 leaving its more than 1,500 radioactive fuel assemblies left
exposed. It is this dangerous situation that is first on the long list of clean
up that needs to happen at Fukushima. The cleanup of
Public Image
The disaster at
Fukushima raises some important environmental questions, and the success or
failure of proper clean up at the facility will have an impact on the
connotation of nuclear power. If they Tepco team is successful in the cleanup
the company will regain some of its credibility and it will give praise to the
engineers on the team proving that there skills are up to the task. If the
cleanup process goes well I think it will also lend a hand to the image of
nuclear power. Events like Chernobyl and the general risk of harnessing nuclear
power scare the general population, and with good reason, but I think that if
all goes well at the facility it will show that even in the face of
environmental disasters, nuclear power can be contained in a safe way. On the
other hand if problems occur that result in further damage to people or the
environment, the image of nuclear power will be further diminished.
Challenges for future
The disaster has
brought up questions future Biosystems or Nuclear engineers will need to
consider. The main question clearly is how can we prevent future disaster? This
questions pits Mother Nature
against man made technology. Future engineers will
have to prepare for natures events, earth quakes, tsunamis, tornados,
hurricanes, etc. To do this they will have to consider the very location of a
plant and design a structure that can withstand these events. Also they will
need to be more conscious or the worst case scenario and be highly prepared if
it happens.
I've read quite a few stories in recent years regarding mismanagement of energy resources, and it's nice to see people truly noticing it. As you mentioned, people have to think about the worst case scenario.
ReplyDeletepeople need think both sides of the things what they are doing otherwise this world will be a dangerous place to live
ReplyDeleteI first heard about this disaster in an engineering class last year. It's so true that a huge concern is clean up and ultimately how we can prevent problems in the future.
ReplyDelete